Javascript is required to run this page

Election Results

Norfolk City: City Council (Superward 7)
25 of 25 election-day precincts reporting
0 estimated early votes outstanding
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Independent Candidate
Danica J. Royster  Winner 
6,811 27.64%
Independent Candidate
Jackie Hope Glass
6,355 25.79%
Independent Candidate
Michael J. Muhammad
5,194 21.08%
Independent Candidate
Phillip Hawkins, Jr.
3,411 13.84%
Independent Candidate
Jason L. Inge
1,626 6.60%
Independent Candidate
Frederick S. McRae
1,035 4.20%
Independent Candidate
Write In
206 0.84%
A map displaying precinct-level results.
Precincts

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
ROYSTER 1,678 34.54%
MUHAMMAD 980 20.17%
GLASS 932 19.18%
HAWKINS 801 16.49%
INGE 307 6.32%
MCRAE 131 2.70%
29 0.60%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
ROYSTER 1,295 40.65%
MUHAMMAD 593 18.61%
GLASS 584 18.33%
HAWKINS 312 9.79%
INGE 285 8.95%
MCRAE 98 3.08%
19 0.60%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
ROYSTER 48 37.21%
GLASS 32 24.81%
INGE 21 16.28%
MUHAMMAD 19 14.73%
HAWKINS 7 5.43%
1 0.78%
MCRAE 1 0.78%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
GLASS 27 29.03%
ROYSTER 23 24.73%
MUHAMMAD 22 23.66%
HAWKINS 12 12.90%
MCRAE 6 6.45%
INGE 3 3.23%
0 0.00%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
ROYSTER 119 30.51%
MUHAMMAD 113 28.97%
GLASS 92 23.59%
HAWKINS 37 9.49%
INGE 20 5.13%
MCRAE 8 2.05%
1 0.26%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
MUHAMMAD 200 28.78%
ROYSTER 178 25.61%
GLASS 144 20.72%
MCRAE 80 11.51%
HAWKINS 45 6.47%
INGE 37 5.32%
11 1.58%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
MUHAMMAD 203 35.49%
ROYSTER 151 26.40%
GLASS 142 24.83%
HAWKINS 29 5.07%
INGE 25 4.37%
MCRAE 17 2.97%
5 0.87%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
GLASS 209 32.15%
ROYSTER 138 21.23%
HAWKINS 117 18.00%
MUHAMMAD 89 13.69%
INGE 61 9.38%
MCRAE 21 3.23%
15 2.31%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
GLASS 259 38.60%
MUHAMMAD 174 25.93%
ROYSTER 120 17.88%
HAWKINS 63 9.39%
INGE 29 4.32%
MCRAE 23 3.43%
3 0.45%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
GLASS 150 32.05%
MUHAMMAD 146 31.20%
ROYSTER 99 21.15%
HAWKINS 37 7.91%
INGE 25 5.34%
6 1.28%
MCRAE 5 1.07%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
GLASS 281 36.30%
MUHAMMAD 223 28.81%
ROYSTER 137 17.70%
HAWKINS 55 7.11%
MCRAE 49 6.33%
INGE 23 2.97%
6 0.78%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
ROYSTER 159 36.22%
MUHAMMAD 116 26.42%
GLASS 68 15.49%
INGE 39 8.88%
HAWKINS 36 8.20%
MCRAE 17 3.87%
4 0.91%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
GLASS 264 43.21%
ROYSTER 111 18.17%
HAWKINS 94 15.38%
MUHAMMAD 88 14.40%
INGE 42 6.87%
MCRAE 10 1.64%
2 0.33%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
GLASS 233 44.98%
ROYSTER 118 22.78%
MUHAMMAD 99 19.11%
HAWKINS 28 5.41%
INGE 22 4.25%
MCRAE 13 2.51%
5 0.97%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
GLASS 350 31.53%
MUHAMMAD 232 20.90%
ROYSTER 230 20.72%
HAWKINS 171 15.41%
INGE 59 5.32%
MCRAE 55 4.95%
13 1.17%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
HAWKINS 346 32.61%
GLASS 246 23.19%
MUHAMMAD 207 19.51%
ROYSTER 186 17.53%
INGE 51 4.81%
MCRAE 21 1.98%
4 0.38%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
GLASS 398 31.44%
ROYSTER 379 29.94%
MUHAMMAD 172 13.59%
INGE 136 10.74%
HAWKINS 105 8.29%
MCRAE 51 4.03%
25 1.97%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
ROYSTER 160 46.78%
MUHAMMAD 86 25.15%
GLASS 51 14.91%
HAWKINS 26 7.60%
MCRAE 12 3.51%
INGE 5 1.46%
2 0.58%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
ROYSTER 156 26.94%
MUHAMMAD 147 25.39%
GLASS 124 21.42%
HAWKINS 105 18.13%
MCRAE 33 5.70%
INGE 11 1.90%
3 0.52%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
GLASS 150 26.04%
ROYSTER 141 24.48%
MUHAMMAD 119 20.66%
MCRAE 79 13.72%
HAWKINS 68 11.81%
INGE 17 2.95%
2 0.35%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
GLASS 283 46.93%
MUHAMMAD 133 22.06%
ROYSTER 124 20.56%
HAWKINS 31 5.14%
MCRAE 16 2.65%
INGE 13 2.16%
3 0.50%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
GLASS 216 35.64%
ROYSTER 120 19.80%
MUHAMMAD 102 16.83%
INGE 91 15.02%
HAWKINS 60 9.90%
MCRAE 13 2.15%
4 0.66%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
ROYSTER 188 24.10%
GLASS 176 22.56%
HAWKINS 148 18.97%
INGE 115 14.74%
MUHAMMAD 113 14.49%
MCRAE 30 3.85%
10 1.28%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
GLASS 189 30.73%
ROYSTER 127 20.65%
HAWKINS 103 16.75%
MUHAMMAD 72 11.71%
INGE 61 9.92%
MCRAE 57 9.27%
6 0.98%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
HAWKINS 90 30.82%
ROYSTER 85 29.11%
MUHAMMAD 62 21.23%
GLASS 45 15.41%
MCRAE 5 1.71%
INGE 4 1.37%
1 0.34%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
MUHAMMAD 231 32.04%
HAWKINS 217 30.10%
ROYSTER 107 14.84%
GLASS 105 14.56%
MCRAE 36 4.99%
INGE 24 3.33%
1 0.14%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
ROYSTER 233 25.89%
MUHAMMAD 224 24.89%
GLASS 216 24.00%
HAWKINS 154 17.11%
INGE 35 3.89%
MCRAE 29 3.22%
9 1.00%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
GLASS 164 32.87%
MUHAMMAD 144 28.86%
ROYSTER 85 17.03%
MCRAE 63 12.63%
HAWKINS 26 5.21%
INGE 15 3.01%
2 0.40%

Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
GLASS 225 35.49%
ROYSTER 116 18.30%
HAWKINS 88 13.88%
MUHAMMAD 85 13.41%
MCRAE 56 8.83%
INGE 50 7.89%
14 2.21%
Source: Virginia Department of Elections and the Associated Press.