Election Results
Sponsored by
Norfolk City: City Council (Superward 7)
25
of 25
election-day precincts reporting
0 estimated early votes outstanding
Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|
Independent Candidate
Danica J. Royster
Winner
|
6,811 | 27.64% |
Independent Candidate
Jackie Hope Glass
|
6,355 | 25.79% |
Independent Candidate
Michael J. Muhammad
|
5,194 | 21.08% |
Independent Candidate
Phillip Hawkins, Jr.
|
3,411 | 13.84% |
Independent Candidate
Jason L. Inge
|
1,626 | 6.60% |
Independent Candidate
Frederick S. McRae
|
1,035 | 4.20% |
Independent Candidate
Write In
|
206 | 0.84% |
A map displaying precinct-level results.
This map displays only votes cast on Election Day, and does not include
early ballots.
Precincts
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
ROYSTER |
|
1,678 | 34.54% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
980 | 20.17% |
GLASS |
|
932 | 19.18% |
HAWKINS |
|
801 | 16.49% |
INGE |
|
307 | 6.32% |
MCRAE |
|
131 | 2.70% |
|
29 | 0.60% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
ROYSTER |
|
1,295 | 40.65% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
593 | 18.61% |
GLASS |
|
584 | 18.33% |
HAWKINS |
|
312 | 9.79% |
INGE |
|
285 | 8.95% |
MCRAE |
|
98 | 3.08% |
|
19 | 0.60% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
ROYSTER |
|
48 | 37.21% |
GLASS |
|
32 | 24.81% |
INGE |
|
21 | 16.28% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
19 | 14.73% |
HAWKINS |
|
7 | 5.43% |
|
1 | 0.78% | |
MCRAE |
|
1 | 0.78% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
GLASS |
|
27 | 29.03% |
ROYSTER |
|
23 | 24.73% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
22 | 23.66% |
HAWKINS |
|
12 | 12.90% |
MCRAE |
|
6 | 6.45% |
INGE |
|
3 | 3.23% |
|
0 | 0.00% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
ROYSTER |
|
119 | 30.51% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
113 | 28.97% |
GLASS |
|
92 | 23.59% |
HAWKINS |
|
37 | 9.49% |
INGE |
|
20 | 5.13% |
MCRAE |
|
8 | 2.05% |
|
1 | 0.26% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
MUHAMMAD |
|
200 | 28.78% |
ROYSTER |
|
178 | 25.61% |
GLASS |
|
144 | 20.72% |
MCRAE |
|
80 | 11.51% |
HAWKINS |
|
45 | 6.47% |
INGE |
|
37 | 5.32% |
|
11 | 1.58% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
MUHAMMAD |
|
203 | 35.49% |
ROYSTER |
|
151 | 26.40% |
GLASS |
|
142 | 24.83% |
HAWKINS |
|
29 | 5.07% |
INGE |
|
25 | 4.37% |
MCRAE |
|
17 | 2.97% |
|
5 | 0.87% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
GLASS |
|
209 | 32.15% |
ROYSTER |
|
138 | 21.23% |
HAWKINS |
|
117 | 18.00% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
89 | 13.69% |
INGE |
|
61 | 9.38% |
MCRAE |
|
21 | 3.23% |
|
15 | 2.31% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
GLASS |
|
259 | 38.60% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
174 | 25.93% |
ROYSTER |
|
120 | 17.88% |
HAWKINS |
|
63 | 9.39% |
INGE |
|
29 | 4.32% |
MCRAE |
|
23 | 3.43% |
|
3 | 0.45% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
GLASS |
|
150 | 32.05% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
146 | 31.20% |
ROYSTER |
|
99 | 21.15% |
HAWKINS |
|
37 | 7.91% |
INGE |
|
25 | 5.34% |
|
6 | 1.28% | |
MCRAE |
|
5 | 1.07% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
GLASS |
|
281 | 36.30% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
223 | 28.81% |
ROYSTER |
|
137 | 17.70% |
HAWKINS |
|
55 | 7.11% |
MCRAE |
|
49 | 6.33% |
INGE |
|
23 | 2.97% |
|
6 | 0.78% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
ROYSTER |
|
159 | 36.22% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
116 | 26.42% |
GLASS |
|
68 | 15.49% |
INGE |
|
39 | 8.88% |
HAWKINS |
|
36 | 8.20% |
MCRAE |
|
17 | 3.87% |
|
4 | 0.91% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
GLASS |
|
264 | 43.21% |
ROYSTER |
|
111 | 18.17% |
HAWKINS |
|
94 | 15.38% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
88 | 14.40% |
INGE |
|
42 | 6.87% |
MCRAE |
|
10 | 1.64% |
|
2 | 0.33% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
GLASS |
|
233 | 44.98% |
ROYSTER |
|
118 | 22.78% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
99 | 19.11% |
HAWKINS |
|
28 | 5.41% |
INGE |
|
22 | 4.25% |
MCRAE |
|
13 | 2.51% |
|
5 | 0.97% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
GLASS |
|
350 | 31.53% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
232 | 20.90% |
ROYSTER |
|
230 | 20.72% |
HAWKINS |
|
171 | 15.41% |
INGE |
|
59 | 5.32% |
MCRAE |
|
55 | 4.95% |
|
13 | 1.17% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
HAWKINS |
|
346 | 32.61% |
GLASS |
|
246 | 23.19% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
207 | 19.51% |
ROYSTER |
|
186 | 17.53% |
INGE |
|
51 | 4.81% |
MCRAE |
|
21 | 1.98% |
|
4 | 0.38% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
GLASS |
|
398 | 31.44% |
ROYSTER |
|
379 | 29.94% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
172 | 13.59% |
INGE |
|
136 | 10.74% |
HAWKINS |
|
105 | 8.29% |
MCRAE |
|
51 | 4.03% |
|
25 | 1.97% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
ROYSTER |
|
160 | 46.78% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
86 | 25.15% |
GLASS |
|
51 | 14.91% |
HAWKINS |
|
26 | 7.60% |
MCRAE |
|
12 | 3.51% |
INGE |
|
5 | 1.46% |
|
2 | 0.58% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
ROYSTER |
|
156 | 26.94% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
147 | 25.39% |
GLASS |
|
124 | 21.42% |
HAWKINS |
|
105 | 18.13% |
MCRAE |
|
33 | 5.70% |
INGE |
|
11 | 1.90% |
|
3 | 0.52% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
GLASS |
|
150 | 26.04% |
ROYSTER |
|
141 | 24.48% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
119 | 20.66% |
MCRAE |
|
79 | 13.72% |
HAWKINS |
|
68 | 11.81% |
INGE |
|
17 | 2.95% |
|
2 | 0.35% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
GLASS |
|
283 | 46.93% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
133 | 22.06% |
ROYSTER |
|
124 | 20.56% |
HAWKINS |
|
31 | 5.14% |
MCRAE |
|
16 | 2.65% |
INGE |
|
13 | 2.16% |
|
3 | 0.50% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
GLASS |
|
216 | 35.64% |
ROYSTER |
|
120 | 19.80% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
102 | 16.83% |
INGE |
|
91 | 15.02% |
HAWKINS |
|
60 | 9.90% |
MCRAE |
|
13 | 2.15% |
|
4 | 0.66% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
ROYSTER |
|
188 | 24.10% |
GLASS |
|
176 | 22.56% |
HAWKINS |
|
148 | 18.97% |
INGE |
|
115 | 14.74% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
113 | 14.49% |
MCRAE |
|
30 | 3.85% |
|
10 | 1.28% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
GLASS |
|
189 | 30.73% |
ROYSTER |
|
127 | 20.65% |
HAWKINS |
|
103 | 16.75% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
72 | 11.71% |
INGE |
|
61 | 9.92% |
MCRAE |
|
57 | 9.27% |
|
6 | 0.98% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
HAWKINS |
|
90 | 30.82% |
ROYSTER |
|
85 | 29.11% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
62 | 21.23% |
GLASS |
|
45 | 15.41% |
MCRAE |
|
5 | 1.71% |
INGE |
|
4 | 1.37% |
|
1 | 0.34% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
MUHAMMAD |
|
231 | 32.04% |
HAWKINS |
|
217 | 30.10% |
ROYSTER |
|
107 | 14.84% |
GLASS |
|
105 | 14.56% |
MCRAE |
|
36 | 4.99% |
INGE |
|
24 | 3.33% |
|
1 | 0.14% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
ROYSTER |
|
233 | 25.89% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
224 | 24.89% |
GLASS |
|
216 | 24.00% |
HAWKINS |
|
154 | 17.11% |
INGE |
|
35 | 3.89% |
MCRAE |
|
29 | 3.22% |
|
9 | 1.00% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
GLASS |
|
164 | 32.87% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
144 | 28.86% |
ROYSTER |
|
85 | 17.03% |
MCRAE |
|
63 | 12.63% |
HAWKINS |
|
26 | 5.21% |
INGE |
|
15 | 3.01% |
|
2 | 0.40% |
Candidate | Result bar | Votes | Percent Reporting |
---|---|---|---|
GLASS |
|
225 | 35.49% |
ROYSTER |
|
116 | 18.30% |
HAWKINS |
|
88 | 13.88% |
MUHAMMAD |
|
85 | 13.41% |
MCRAE |
|
56 | 8.83% |
INGE |
|
50 | 7.89% |
|
14 | 2.21% |
Source: Virginia Department of Elections and the Associated Press.