Most Incumbents Have Cash Advantage
A record 17 state delegates face a primary election challenge next Tuesday, and all but three held a campaign cash advantage heading into the final week and a half before the Election Day. The House contests listed below are sorted by the incumbent's advantage, from the least to the most. This is one (but certainly not the only) measure of a race's competitiveness.
*Denotes incumbent
Challengers who had a cash advantage
District 38 | |||
Holly Hazard |
|
||
Kaye Kory* |
|
||
Challenger Holly Hazard had a 9:1 advantage. | |||
District 45 | |||
Elizabeth Bennett-Parker |
|
||
Mark Levine* |
|
||
Challenger Elizabeth Bennett-Parker had a nearly 3:1 advantage. | |||
District 2 | |||
Pamela Montgomery |
|
||
Candi King* |
|
||
Challenger Pamela Montgomery had a 2:1 advantage. |
Incumbents who had a cash advantage
District 50 | |||
Lee Carter* |
|
||
Michelle Maldonado |
|
||
Helen Zurita |
|
||
Del. Lee Carter had a 1.4:1 advantage. | |||
District 31 | |||
Elizabeth Guzman* |
|
||
Rod Hall |
|
||
Kara Pitek |
|
||
Idris O'Connor |
|
||
Del. Elizabeth Guzman had a 2:1 advantage | |||
District 86 | |||
Ibraheem Samirah* |
|
||
Irene Shin |
|
||
Del. Ibraheem Samirah had a 2:1 advantage. | |||
District 49 | |||
Alfonso Lopez* |
|
||
Karishma Mehta |
|
||
Del. Alfonso Lopez had nearly a 3:1 advantage. | |||
District 79 | |||
Steve Heretick* |
|
||
Nadarius Clark |
|
||
Dante Walston |
|
||
Del. Steve Heretick had a 3:1 advantage. | |||
District 68 | |||
Dawn Adams* |
|
||
Kyle Elliott |
|
||
Del. Dawn Adams had a 3:1 advantage. | |||
District 34 | |||
Kathleen Murphy* |
|
||
Jennifer Adeli |
|
||
Del. Kathleen Murphy had a 14:1 advantage. | |||
District 89 | |||
Jay Jones |
|
||
Hannah Kinder |
|
||
Del. Jay Jones had a 27:1 advantage. | |||
District 22 | |||
Kathy Byron* |
|
||
Isaiah Knight |
|
||
Del. Kathy Byron had a 28:1 advantage. | |||
District 24 | |||
Ronnie Campbell* |
|
||
Mark Reed |
|
||
Del. Ronnie Campbell had a 463:1 advantage. | |||
District 71 | |||
Jeff Bourne* |
|
||
Richard Walker |
|
||
Del. Jeff Bourne had a 580:1 advantage. | |||
District 36 | |||
Ken Plum* |
|
||
Mary Barthelson |
|
||
Del. Ken Plum had a 735:1 advantage. | |||
District 9 | |||
Charles Poindexter* |
|
||
Wren Williams1 |
|
||
Charles Poindexter's opponent has not reported any available cash; 1Candidate has not filed a June 1st report | |||
District 74 | |||
Lamont Bagby* |
|
||
John Dantzler1 |
|
||
Lamont Bagby's opponent has not reported any available cash; 1Candidate has not filed a June 1st report |
Sources: Campaign finance reports filed June 1 with the State Board of Elections showing ending balances as of Thursday, May 27. The ratio was determined by this formula [candidate with the most cash on hand] / [the candidate with the second-most cash on hand]
June 3, 2021