State Senate District 15

Capital
Strong Democratic
District Profile
Elections
Precinct Results
Redistricting

Partisan Lean of SD15 voters

Based on 2021 Governor's Race
Results are based on estimated absentee votes.
The state Department of Elections does not publish results by state legislative district. VPAP has developed what it believes to be reasonable estimates for calcuating the results by legislative district. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Democrat Candidate
Terry McAuliffe 		40,797 58.86%
Republican Candidate
Glenn Youngkin 		27,658 39.90%
Liberation Party Candidate
Princess Blanding 		829 1.20%
Election-Day Ballots Mapped by Precinct
The results on this map are incomplete and do not include an estimated 29,573 early ballots.
>+20D
0 to +20D
0 to +20R
>+20R
Chesterfield County
Election Day Votes: 55.6%
Early In-Person Votes: 34.1%
Mail Ballots: 10.3%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 30,917 53.62%
Youngkin 26,154 45.36%
Blanding 556 0.96%
Estimated results for Chesterfield County.
Chesterfield County contains "split" precincts (*) for SD15. Explain
Chesterfield County set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of Chesterfield County that falls within SD15.


These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 10,438 53.13%
Youngkin 9,074 46.19%
Blanding 125 0.64%

These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 4,537 76.24%
Youngkin 1,337 22.47%
Blanding 87 1.46%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 435 53.57%
McAuliffe 365 44.95%
Blanding 12 1.48%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 688 57.86%
McAuliffe 482 40.54%
Blanding 18 1.51%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 1,123 63.23%
McAuliffe 642 36.15%
Blanding 11 0.62%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 876 65.57%
McAuliffe 447 33.46%
Blanding 10 0.75%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 407 55.45%
Youngkin 317 43.19%
Blanding 10 1.36%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 820 51.64%
McAuliffe 749 47.17%
Blanding 18 1.13%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 621 53.08%
McAuliffe 537 45.90%
Blanding 11 0.94%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 883 64.03%
McAuliffe 484 35.10%
Blanding 11 0.80%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 1,076 58.54%
McAuliffe 752 40.91%
Blanding 8 0.44%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 580 59.12%
McAuliffe 390 39.76%
Blanding 11 1.12%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 480 52.23%
McAuliffe 437 47.55%
Blanding 2 0.22%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 423 50.66%
McAuliffe 400 47.90%
Blanding 11 1.32%

This is a "split" precinct. Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 268 60.63%
McAuliffe 169 38.24%
Blanding 4 0.90%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 777 63.38%
Youngkin 425 34.67%
Blanding 23 1.88%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 328 58.16%
McAuliffe 227 40.25%
Blanding 9 1.60%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 395 50.06%
McAuliffe 388 49.18%
Blanding 6 0.76%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 633 67.06%
Youngkin 304 32.20%
Blanding 7 0.74%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 438 77.66%
Youngkin 115 20.39%
Blanding 11 1.95%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 223 65.01%
Youngkin 114 33.24%
Blanding 6 1.75%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 594 69.23%
Youngkin 255 29.72%
Blanding 9 1.05%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 580 60.23%
McAuliffe 374 38.84%
Blanding 7 0.73%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 858 58.69%
Youngkin 583 39.88%
Blanding 16 1.09%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 401 56.96%
McAuliffe 295 41.90%
Blanding 6 0.85%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 382 67.97%
Youngkin 169 30.07%
Blanding 9 1.60%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 110 78.01%
Youngkin 27 19.15%
Blanding 4 2.84%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 277 61.28%
Youngkin 170 37.61%
Blanding 5 1.11%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 647 76.21%
Youngkin 194 22.85%
Blanding 8 0.94%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 530 50.67%
Youngkin 503 48.09%
Blanding 13 1.24%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 560 56.51%
McAuliffe 421 42.48%
Blanding 9 0.91%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 402 51.28%
Youngkin 376 47.96%
Blanding 6 0.77%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 1,049 58.64%
McAuliffe 721 40.30%
Blanding 18 1.01%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 355 63.85%
Youngkin 191 34.35%
Blanding 10 1.80%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 615 71.59%
Youngkin 223 25.96%
Blanding 18 2.10%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 414 67.54%
Youngkin 191 31.16%
Blanding 7 1.14%
Richmond City
Election Day Votes: 65.9%
Early In-Person Votes: 25.6%
Mail Ballots: 8.5%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 9,880 84.77%
Youngkin 1,504 12.90%
Blanding 273 2.34%
Estimated results for Richmond City.
Richmond City contains "split" precincts (*) for SD15. Explain
Richmond City set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of Richmond City that falls within SD15.


These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 2,674 89.55%
Youngkin 287 9.61%
Blanding 26 0.87%

These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 915 92.42%
Youngkin 57 5.76%
Blanding 23 2.32%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

This is a "split" precinct. Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 693 73.88%
Youngkin 215 22.92%
Blanding 30 3.20%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 656 76.46%
Youngkin 181 21.10%
Blanding 20 2.33%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 506 87.09%
Youngkin 51 8.78%
Blanding 24 4.13%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 373 79.53%
Youngkin 73 15.57%
Blanding 22 4.69%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 354 81.76%
Youngkin 66 15.24%
Blanding 13 3.00%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 715 82.18%
Youngkin 135 15.52%
Blanding 19 2.18%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 320 89.14%
Youngkin 30 8.36%
Blanding 9 2.51%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 179 88.61%
Youngkin 15 7.43%
Blanding 8 3.96%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 451 80.11%
Youngkin 95 16.87%
Blanding 17 3.02%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 478 84.01%
Youngkin 75 13.18%
Blanding 15 2.64%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 565 81.65%
Youngkin 101 14.60%
Blanding 26 3.76%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 478 83.42%
Youngkin 88 15.36%
Blanding 7 1.22%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 523 91.43%
Youngkin 35 6.12%
Blanding 14 2.45%
In order to calculate the number of votes within each precinct split between two or more districts, VPAP uses the proportion of voters within that portion of the precinct, which is provided by locality registrars on a monthly basis. If voter registration data is unavailable, for example when redistricting occurs, then VPAP will use the proportion of voting age population within that portion of the precinct, calculated using Census block-level data.