State Senate District 5
SW Virginia
Partisan Lean of SD5 voters
Based on 2021 Governor's Race
Results are based on estimated absentee votes.
Details
The state Department of Elections does not publish results by state legislative district. VPAP has developed what it believes to be reasonable estimates for calcuating the results by legislative district.
Methodology
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
|
Republican Candidate
Glenn Youngkin
|
51,832 | 71.24% |
|
Democrat Candidate
Terry McAuliffe
|
20,415 | 28.06% |
|
Liberation Party Candidate
Princess Blanding
|
500 | 0.69% |
Election-Day Ballots Mapped by Precinct
The results on this map are incomplete and do not include an estimated 22,084 early ballots.
>+20D
0 to +20D
0 to +20R
>+20R
Bland County
Election Day Votes: 78.0%
Early In-Person Votes: 17.6%
Mail Ballots: 4.4%
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 2,274 | 85.78% |
| McAuliffe | 364 | 13.73% |
| Blanding | 12 | 0.45% |
Actual
results for Bland County.
Methodology
SD5 includes all of Bland County, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.
These are actual results for SD5.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 386 | 82.83% |
| McAuliffe | 78 | 16.74% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.43% |
These are actual results for SD5.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 63 | 54.31% |
| Youngkin | 50 | 43.10% |
| Blanding | 3 | 2.59% |
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 213 | 87.30% |
| McAuliffe | 30 | 12.30% |
| Blanding | 0 | 0.00% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 257 | 87.41% |
| McAuliffe | 36 | 12.24% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.34% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 73 | 82.02% |
| McAuliffe | 16 | 17.98% |
| Blanding | 0 | 0.00% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 428 | 89.54% |
| McAuliffe | 49 | 10.25% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.21% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 265 | 92.33% |
| McAuliffe | 20 | 6.97% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.70% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 136 | 91.28% |
| McAuliffe | 13 | 8.72% |
| Blanding | 0 | 0.00% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 466 | 88.26% |
| McAuliffe | 59 | 11.17% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.57% |
Giles County
Election Day Votes: 61.9%
Early In-Person Votes: 33.9%
Mail Ballots: 4.2%
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 5,788 | 78.34% |
| McAuliffe | 1,534 | 20.76% |
| Blanding | 62 | 0.84% |
Actual
results for Giles County.
Methodology
SD5 includes all of Giles County, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.
These are actual results for SD5.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 1,882 | 75.16% |
| McAuliffe | 608 | 24.28% |
| Blanding | 14 | 0.56% |
These are actual results for SD5.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 176 | 56.05% |
| Youngkin | 135 | 42.99% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.64% |
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 74 | 87.06% |
| McAuliffe | 11 | 12.94% |
| Blanding | 0 | 0.00% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 299 | 85.67% |
| McAuliffe | 49 | 14.04% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.29% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 758 | 86.93% |
| McAuliffe | 105 | 12.04% |
| Blanding | 8 | 0.92% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 742 | 84.99% |
| McAuliffe | 123 | 14.09% |
| Blanding | 8 | 0.92% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 217 | 86.45% |
| McAuliffe | 33 | 13.15% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.40% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 150 | 89.29% |
| McAuliffe | 14 | 8.33% |
| Blanding | 4 | 2.38% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 335 | 76.31% |
| McAuliffe | 103 | 23.46% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.23% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 775 | 82.18% |
| McAuliffe | 152 | 16.12% |
| Blanding | 15 | 1.59% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 421 | 71.36% |
| McAuliffe | 160 | 27.12% |
| Blanding | 8 | 1.36% |
Montgomery County
Election Day Votes: 64.7%
Early In-Person Votes: 26.4%
Mail Ballots: 8.9%
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 8,731 | 53.93% |
| Youngkin | 7,294 | 45.05% |
| Blanding | 192 | 1.19% |
Estimated
results for Montgomery County.
Methodology
Montgomery County contains "split" precincts (*) for SD5.
Explain
Montgomery County set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of Montgomery County that falls within SD5.
These are estimated results.
Methodology
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 2,685 | 62.69% |
| Youngkin | 1,558 | 36.38% |
| Blanding | 38 | 0.89% |
These are estimated results.
Methodology
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 1,216 | 84.68% |
| Youngkin | 229 | 15.95% |
| Blanding | 29 | 2.02% |
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 488 | 69.52% |
| Youngkin | 197 | 28.06% |
| Blanding | 16 | 2.28% |
This is a "split" precinct.
Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 586 | 60.41% |
| Youngkin | 372 | 38.35% |
| Blanding | 12 | 1.24% |
This is a "split" precinct.
Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 202 | 62.54% |
| McAuliffe | 118 | 36.53% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.62% |
This is a "split" precinct.
Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 159 | 72.94% |
| McAuliffe | 56 | 25.69% |
| Blanding | 3 | 1.38% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 975 | 82.07% |
| McAuliffe | 208 | 17.51% |
| Blanding | 5 | 0.42% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 799 | 82.80% |
| McAuliffe | 159 | 16.48% |
| Blanding | 5 | 0.52% |
This is a "split" precinct.
Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 228 | 68.47% |
| McAuliffe | 101 | 30.33% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.90% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 611 | 60.74% |
| McAuliffe | 381 | 37.87% |
| Blanding | 12 | 1.19% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 617 | 69.72% |
| McAuliffe | 262 | 29.60% |
| Blanding | 6 | 0.68% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 189 | 73.83% |
| Youngkin | 56 | 21.88% |
| Blanding | 10 | 3.91% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 565 | 61.21% |
| Youngkin | 347 | 37.59% |
| Blanding | 10 | 1.08% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 603 | 65.83% |
| Youngkin | 302 | 32.97% |
| Blanding | 10 | 1.09% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 52 | 53.06% |
| McAuliffe | 40 | 40.82% |
| Blanding | 6 | 6.12% |
This is a "split" precinct.
Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 702 | 61.15% |
| Youngkin | 431 | 37.54% |
| Blanding | 15 | 1.31% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 372 | 68.76% |
| Youngkin | 159 | 29.39% |
| Blanding | 10 | 1.85% |
Pulaski County
Election Day Votes: 67.5%
Early In-Person Votes: 24.5%
Mail Ballots: 8.0%
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 9,627 | 74.09% |
| McAuliffe | 3,269 | 25.16% |
| Blanding | 88 | 0.68% |
Actual
results for Pulaski County.
Methodology
SD5 includes all of Pulaski County, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.
These are actual results for SD5.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 2,164 | 68.05% |
| McAuliffe | 991 | 31.16% |
| Blanding | 21 | 0.66% |
These are actual results for SD5.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 660 | 63.46% |
| Youngkin | 361 | 34.71% |
| Blanding | 18 | 1.73% |
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 373 | 78.69% |
| McAuliffe | 99 | 20.89% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.42% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 826 | 70.72% |
| McAuliffe | 337 | 28.85% |
| Blanding | 4 | 0.34% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 506 | 82.82% |
| McAuliffe | 102 | 16.69% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.49% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 635 | 84.33% |
| McAuliffe | 116 | 15.41% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.27% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 90 | 74.38% |
| McAuliffe | 27 | 22.31% |
| Blanding | 3 | 2.48% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 846 | 79.36% |
| McAuliffe | 216 | 20.26% |
| Blanding | 4 | 0.38% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 804 | 84.63% |
| McAuliffe | 142 | 14.95% |
| Blanding | 4 | 0.42% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 218 | 84.50% |
| McAuliffe | 39 | 15.12% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.39% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 555 | 84.99% |
| McAuliffe | 92 | 14.09% |
| Blanding | 5 | 0.77% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 913 | 83.99% |
| McAuliffe | 165 | 15.18% |
| Blanding | 8 | 0.74% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 420 | 87.32% |
| McAuliffe | 59 | 12.27% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.42% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 916 | 79.58% |
| McAuliffe | 224 | 19.46% |
| Blanding | 11 | 0.96% |
Radford City
Election Day Votes: 61.5%
Early In-Person Votes: 31.0%
Mail Ballots: 7.5%
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 2,266 | 54.09% |
| McAuliffe | 1,874 | 44.74% |
| Blanding | 44 | 1.05% |
Actual
results for Radford City.
Methodology
SD5 includes all of Radford City, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.
These are actual results for SD5.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 667 | 51.31% |
| Youngkin | 623 | 47.92% |
| Blanding | 8 | 0.62% |
These are actual results for SD5.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 233 | 74.68% |
| Youngkin | 78 | 25.00% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.32% |
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 272 | 54.95% |
| McAuliffe | 215 | 43.43% |
| Blanding | 8 | 1.62% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 478 | 59.82% |
| McAuliffe | 308 | 38.55% |
| Blanding | 13 | 1.63% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 609 | 66.92% |
| McAuliffe | 290 | 31.87% |
| Blanding | 8 | 0.88% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 206 | 55.23% |
| McAuliffe | 161 | 43.16% |
| Blanding | 6 | 1.61% |
Smyth County
Election Day Votes: 85.2%
Early In-Person Votes: 9.2%
Mail Ballots: 5.5%
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 8,475 | 82.55% |
| McAuliffe | 1,751 | 17.05% |
| Blanding | 35 | 0.34% |
Actual
results for Smyth County.
Methodology
SD5 includes all of Smyth County, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.
These are actual results for SD5.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 681 | 72.14% |
| McAuliffe | 262 | 27.75% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.11% |
These are actual results for SD5.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 296 | 51.93% |
| McAuliffe | 266 | 46.67% |
| Blanding | 6 | 1.05% |
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 970 | 86.22% |
| McAuliffe | 151 | 13.42% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.27% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 739 | 90.79% |
| McAuliffe | 75 | 9.21% |
| Blanding | 0 | 0.00% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 303 | 83.70% |
| McAuliffe | 56 | 15.47% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.83% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 914 | 86.39% |
| McAuliffe | 141 | 13.33% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.28% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 320 | 88.89% |
| McAuliffe | 40 | 11.11% |
| Blanding | 0 | 0.00% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 548 | 80.83% |
| McAuliffe | 127 | 18.73% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.29% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 297 | 80.71% |
| McAuliffe | 70 | 19.02% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.27% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 758 | 89.92% |
| McAuliffe | 82 | 9.73% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.36% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 387 | 73.71% |
| McAuliffe | 134 | 25.52% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.57% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 582 | 83.62% |
| McAuliffe | 113 | 16.24% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.14% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 358 | 82.49% |
| McAuliffe | 71 | 16.36% |
| Blanding | 5 | 1.15% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 812 | 92.91% |
| McAuliffe | 60 | 6.86% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.11% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 431 | 82.57% |
| McAuliffe | 89 | 17.05% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.38% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 79 | 84.04% |
| McAuliffe | 14 | 14.89% |
| Blanding | 1 | 1.06% |
Tazewell County
Election Day Votes: 68.7%
Early In-Person Votes: 26.1%
Mail Ballots: 5.2%
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 12,037 | 86.62% |
| McAuliffe | 1,816 | 13.07% |
| Blanding | 40 | 0.29% |
Actual
results for Tazewell County.
Methodology
SD5 includes all of Tazewell County, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.
These are actual results for SD5.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 3,050 | 84.18% |
| McAuliffe | 563 | 15.54% |
| Blanding | 10 | 0.28% |
These are actual results for SD5.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 367 | 50.76% |
| McAuliffe | 345 | 47.72% |
| Blanding | 10 | 1.38% |
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 360 | 93.99% |
| McAuliffe | 23 | 6.01% |
| Blanding | 0 | 0.00% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 208 | 90.04% |
| McAuliffe | 23 | 9.96% |
| Blanding | 0 | 0.00% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 407 | 93.14% |
| McAuliffe | 30 | 6.86% |
| Blanding | 0 | 0.00% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 284 | 89.31% |
| McAuliffe | 33 | 10.38% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.31% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 109 | 85.16% |
| McAuliffe | 18 | 14.06% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.78% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 35 | 89.74% |
| McAuliffe | 4 | 10.26% |
| Blanding | 0 | 0.00% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 99 | 94.29% |
| McAuliffe | 6 | 5.71% |
| Blanding | 0 | 0.00% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 129 | 92.81% |
| McAuliffe | 10 | 7.19% |
| Blanding | 0 | 0.00% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 85 | 93.41% |
| McAuliffe | 6 | 6.59% |
| Blanding | 0 | 0.00% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 259 | 92.17% |
| McAuliffe | 21 | 7.47% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.36% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 100 | 86.96% |
| McAuliffe | 15 | 13.04% |
| Blanding | 0 | 0.00% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 879 | 86.18% |
| McAuliffe | 134 | 13.14% |
| Blanding | 5 | 0.49% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 299 | 92.00% |
| McAuliffe | 25 | 7.69% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.31% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 937 | 93.05% |
| McAuliffe | 66 | 6.55% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.30% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 217 | 91.56% |
| McAuliffe | 20 | 8.44% |
| Blanding | 0 | 0.00% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 767 | 91.75% |
| McAuliffe | 68 | 8.13% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.12% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 1,497 | 89.21% |
| McAuliffe | 179 | 10.67% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.12% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 154 | 93.90% |
| McAuliffe | 10 | 6.10% |
| Blanding | 0 | 0.00% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 689 | 92.73% |
| McAuliffe | 51 | 6.86% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.40% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 1,106 | 86.81% |
| McAuliffe | 166 | 13.03% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.16% |
Wythe County
Election Day Votes: 75.4%
Early In-Person Votes: 19.6%
Mail Ballots: 5.0%
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 4,071 | 78.64% |
| McAuliffe | 1,076 | 20.78% |
| Blanding | 27 | 0.52% |
Estimated
results for Wythe County.
Methodology
Wythe County set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of Wythe County that falls within SD5.
These are estimated results.
Methodology
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 680 | 67.19% |
| McAuliffe | 328 | 32.41% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.30% |
These are estimated results.
Methodology
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 137 | 52.49% |
| Youngkin | 121 | 46.36% |
| Blanding | 3 | 1.15% |
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 284 | 87.38% |
| McAuliffe | 40 | 12.31% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.31% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 1,165 | 89.07% |
| McAuliffe | 136 | 10.40% |
| Blanding | 7 | 0.54% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 880 | 81.86% |
| McAuliffe | 187 | 17.40% |
| Blanding | 7 | 0.65% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 941 | 78.68% |
| McAuliffe | 248 | 20.74% |
| Blanding | 6 | 0.50% |
In order to calculate the number of votes within each precinct split between two or more districts, VPAP uses the proportion of voters within that portion of the precinct, which is provided by locality registrars on a monthly basis. If voter registration data is unavailable, for example when redistricting occurs, then VPAP will use the proportion of voting age population within that portion of the precinct, calculated using Census block-level data.
Source:
Virginia Department of Elections